My Opinion: Jón Gnarr - Icelandic Meat Soup Jon Gnarr skrifar 30. maí 2015 09:00 Nationalism seems to be on the rise in Iceland today. People talk much about the so-called national culture, and cite history. This is especially prominent in political debate. Strangely, the debate is rarely about what I find the most Icelandic of all: the gift of poetry itself and artistic expression. It is not tangible enough. The Icelandic national culture seems, for the most part, to evolve around corpulent men who once said something, about processed meat, and some peculiar type of arrogance. Everything natural is turned upside down, and it isn’t the water that hollows the stone, it is the stone that hollows the water with a loud splash. Tenderness is gutlessness and poets are slouches who should stop writing their worthless nonsense and get a job, preferably in meat processing. Importunity and aggression are considered a virtue. Gentleness and politeness are not necessary. Why stand and wait in a line like a moron when you can so easily jump the queue?Vikings It is often maintained that our ancestors were all great Vikings. That’s not quite true. A few Vikings came here, but it was young farmers, slaves and losers who formed the bulk of the settlers of Iceland. It was not considered prestigious to live in or come from Iceland. The Icelandic sagas, especially the Book of Settlements, are our main source of information about the settlement. The Icelandic sagas, however, are not quite trustworthy records. The scribes wrote them down after older oral sources. The sagas are marked by poetic inspiration and exaggerations. Even though they pretend to relate true events, there seems to be a lot there for other reasons than to reflect the truth. No-one really knows why these stories were written. To some extent it was done for political reasons. The first Icelanders were accused of being the descendants of slaves and villains. That’s what they were called in ancient times, but today they would probably be called quitters and losers. People wanted to refute this by writing long genealogies that made them the descendants of Norwegian chieftains. It was also important to secure legal ownership of land. There are few records about peasants and slaves. The sagas are written about a small upper class, and with their needs in mind. Much of it is even a complete lie. For example, I seriously doubt that Ingólfur Arnarson ever existed. I think he was made up, like many others, for the purpose of propaganda.No dogs no Irish! In the Icelandic sagas it is usually maintained that we are all descended from Norway. Examinations of our genome, however, show more Irish blood than was previously presumed. Research indicates that almost a third of the settlers came from the British Isles. And most of them seem to have been women. It could be argued that a majority of our foremothers were British. But our Gaelic heritage has died for the most part and succumbed to our ardor to make us Norwegian. That was considered respectable while everything Irish was shameful. The Irish influence has been disregarded, even obliterated. I think the prejudice against red haired people has been, and even still is, part of this. We redheads are living proof of our ancestry. Perhaps the Gaelic heritage lost because it was so connected to women. The soft and artistic, feminine nerve could not compete with the Norwegian artless and practical importunity. It is also the habit of barbarians to treat artist like losers. I am inclined to think that our ancestors were, for the most part, peaceful and thoughtful people who were running away from the macho madness and bullying of the Vikings. People came here looking for peace and security. I think many of these people were poets. Creative people are rarely brawlers. Therefore, Iceland was an ideal place for all kinds of dreamers. Our nation has one of the highest percentages of ADHD. We are an artistic people. Not everyone succeeds. Creative people often lean towards insobriety. Most criminals suffer from attention-deficiency and a large majority of prisoners committed their crime under the influence. Many criminals are misunderstood artists. And now, when Icelandic politicians are yet again rewriting the history of Iceland for their own advantage, I want to say that I am proud of being an Icelander and the descendant of Irish slaves and losers. I think it is about time that this neglected part of our history gets more attention. It deserves it, and I think it would be very good for us as a nation. In fact, nothing is all-Icelandic, except the language. This is the Icelandic national culture. And it is the Icelandic wretches and losers who have preserved it because they are so often the kind of people who like to prattle and tell stories until someone yells: “Shut up, you loser, and go to work!” Wishing you a good weekend and all kinds of everything for losers! Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein News in English Mest lesið Úr neðsta helvíti Dantes Móheiður Hlíf Geirlaugsdóttir Skoðun Í gamla daga voru allir læsir Eydís Hörn Hermannsdóttir Skoðun Sjávarútvegur framtíðarinnar – friðun, vistvænni veiðar og réttlátara kvótakerfi Arnar Helgi Lárusson Skoðun Er betra að fólk sé sett á sakamannabekk en að stjórnmálamenn vinni vinnuna sína? Ólafur Stephensen Skoðun Harkaleg viðbrögð við friðsamlegum mótmælum Kristín Vala Ragnarsdóttir Skoðun Ung til athafna Hildur Rós Guðbjargardóttir,Eyrún Fríða Árnadóttir Skoðun Hvað með Thorvaldsen börnin á árunum 1967 til 1974? Sölvi Breiðfjörð Skoðun 764 – landamæralaus tala skelfilegs ofbeldis Jón Pétur Zimsen Skoðun Steinunni í 2. sæti Bjarki Bragason Skoðun Ertu að kjósa gegn þínum hagsmunum? Guðni Freyr Öfjörð Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Tilraunastarfsemi stjórnvalda á kostnað matvælaöryggis og lýðheilsu Þorsteinn Narfason skrifar Skoðun Viðkvæmni fyrir gríni? Halldór Auðar Svansson skrifar Skoðun Tímabær endurskoðun jafnlaunavottunar Hákon Skúlason skrifar Skoðun Ertu að kjósa gegn þínum hagsmunum? Guðni Freyr Öfjörð skrifar Skoðun Úr neðsta helvíti Dantes Móheiður Hlíf Geirlaugsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Íbúar í Reykjavík skipta máli ‒ endurreisum íbúaráðin Sigfús Ómar Höskuldsson skrifar Skoðun Breytt heimsmynd kallar á endurmat á öryggi raforkuinnviða Halldór Halldórsson skrifar Skoðun Í gamla daga voru allir læsir Eydís Hörn Hermannsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Kvartanir eru ekki vandamál – viðbrögðin eru það Margrét Reynisdóttir skrifar Skoðun Vatnsmýrin rís Birkir Ingibjartsson skrifar Skoðun Er betra að fólk sé sett á sakamannabekk en að stjórnmálamenn vinni vinnuna sína? Ólafur Stephensen skrifar Skoðun Ung til athafna Hildur Rós Guðbjargardóttir,Eyrún Fríða Árnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað með Thorvaldsen börnin á árunum 1967 til 1974? Sölvi Breiðfjörð skrifar Skoðun Tjáningarfrelsi: Hvers vegna skiptir það máli? Ásgeir Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Sjávarútvegur framtíðarinnar – friðun, vistvænni veiðar og réttlátara kvótakerfi Arnar Helgi Lárusson skrifar Skoðun Loftslagsmál: að lifa vel innan marka jarðar Ingrid Kuhlman skrifar Skoðun Við getum ekki breytt sólinni - en við getum breytt klukkunni! Erla Björnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Steinunni í 2. sæti Bjarki Bragason skrifar Skoðun 764 – landamæralaus tala skelfilegs ofbeldis Jón Pétur Zimsen skrifar Skoðun Harkaleg viðbrögð við friðsamlegum mótmælum Kristín Vala Ragnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hraðbraut við fjöruna í Kópavogi - Kársnesstígur Ómar Stefánsson skrifar Skoðun Er ákveðin stétt sérfræðinga ekki lengur mikilvæg? Sædís Ósk Harðardóttir,Helga Þórey Júlíudóttir skrifar Skoðun Ekki eina ríkisleið í skólamálum, takk! Rósa Guðbjartsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Kynþáttahyggja forseta Bandaríkjanna og Grænland Þorsteinn Gunnarsson skrifar Skoðun Kynslóðaskipti í landbúnaði – áskorun framtíðarinnar Jódís Helga Káradóttir skrifar Skoðun Orðin innantóm um rekstur Hveragerðisbæjar Friðrik Sigurbjörnsson,Alda Pálsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Reykjavík er okkar Viðar Gunnarsson skrifar Skoðun Lýðheilsa og lífsgæði í Reykjavík Heiða Björg Hilmisdóttir skrifar Skoðun Eru bara slæmar fréttir af loftslagsmálum? Þorgerður María Þorbjarnardóttir skrifar Skoðun Nýtt byggingarland á Blikastöðum Regína Ásvaldsdóttir skrifar Sjá meira
Nationalism seems to be on the rise in Iceland today. People talk much about the so-called national culture, and cite history. This is especially prominent in political debate. Strangely, the debate is rarely about what I find the most Icelandic of all: the gift of poetry itself and artistic expression. It is not tangible enough. The Icelandic national culture seems, for the most part, to evolve around corpulent men who once said something, about processed meat, and some peculiar type of arrogance. Everything natural is turned upside down, and it isn’t the water that hollows the stone, it is the stone that hollows the water with a loud splash. Tenderness is gutlessness and poets are slouches who should stop writing their worthless nonsense and get a job, preferably in meat processing. Importunity and aggression are considered a virtue. Gentleness and politeness are not necessary. Why stand and wait in a line like a moron when you can so easily jump the queue?Vikings It is often maintained that our ancestors were all great Vikings. That’s not quite true. A few Vikings came here, but it was young farmers, slaves and losers who formed the bulk of the settlers of Iceland. It was not considered prestigious to live in or come from Iceland. The Icelandic sagas, especially the Book of Settlements, are our main source of information about the settlement. The Icelandic sagas, however, are not quite trustworthy records. The scribes wrote them down after older oral sources. The sagas are marked by poetic inspiration and exaggerations. Even though they pretend to relate true events, there seems to be a lot there for other reasons than to reflect the truth. No-one really knows why these stories were written. To some extent it was done for political reasons. The first Icelanders were accused of being the descendants of slaves and villains. That’s what they were called in ancient times, but today they would probably be called quitters and losers. People wanted to refute this by writing long genealogies that made them the descendants of Norwegian chieftains. It was also important to secure legal ownership of land. There are few records about peasants and slaves. The sagas are written about a small upper class, and with their needs in mind. Much of it is even a complete lie. For example, I seriously doubt that Ingólfur Arnarson ever existed. I think he was made up, like many others, for the purpose of propaganda.No dogs no Irish! In the Icelandic sagas it is usually maintained that we are all descended from Norway. Examinations of our genome, however, show more Irish blood than was previously presumed. Research indicates that almost a third of the settlers came from the British Isles. And most of them seem to have been women. It could be argued that a majority of our foremothers were British. But our Gaelic heritage has died for the most part and succumbed to our ardor to make us Norwegian. That was considered respectable while everything Irish was shameful. The Irish influence has been disregarded, even obliterated. I think the prejudice against red haired people has been, and even still is, part of this. We redheads are living proof of our ancestry. Perhaps the Gaelic heritage lost because it was so connected to women. The soft and artistic, feminine nerve could not compete with the Norwegian artless and practical importunity. It is also the habit of barbarians to treat artist like losers. I am inclined to think that our ancestors were, for the most part, peaceful and thoughtful people who were running away from the macho madness and bullying of the Vikings. People came here looking for peace and security. I think many of these people were poets. Creative people are rarely brawlers. Therefore, Iceland was an ideal place for all kinds of dreamers. Our nation has one of the highest percentages of ADHD. We are an artistic people. Not everyone succeeds. Creative people often lean towards insobriety. Most criminals suffer from attention-deficiency and a large majority of prisoners committed their crime under the influence. Many criminals are misunderstood artists. And now, when Icelandic politicians are yet again rewriting the history of Iceland for their own advantage, I want to say that I am proud of being an Icelander and the descendant of Irish slaves and losers. I think it is about time that this neglected part of our history gets more attention. It deserves it, and I think it would be very good for us as a nation. In fact, nothing is all-Icelandic, except the language. This is the Icelandic national culture. And it is the Icelandic wretches and losers who have preserved it because they are so often the kind of people who like to prattle and tell stories until someone yells: “Shut up, you loser, and go to work!” Wishing you a good weekend and all kinds of everything for losers!
Sjávarútvegur framtíðarinnar – friðun, vistvænni veiðar og réttlátara kvótakerfi Arnar Helgi Lárusson Skoðun
Er betra að fólk sé sett á sakamannabekk en að stjórnmálamenn vinni vinnuna sína? Ólafur Stephensen Skoðun
Skoðun Tilraunastarfsemi stjórnvalda á kostnað matvælaöryggis og lýðheilsu Þorsteinn Narfason skrifar
Skoðun Er betra að fólk sé sett á sakamannabekk en að stjórnmálamenn vinni vinnuna sína? Ólafur Stephensen skrifar
Skoðun Sjávarútvegur framtíðarinnar – friðun, vistvænni veiðar og réttlátara kvótakerfi Arnar Helgi Lárusson skrifar
Skoðun Er ákveðin stétt sérfræðinga ekki lengur mikilvæg? Sædís Ósk Harðardóttir,Helga Þórey Júlíudóttir skrifar
Sjávarútvegur framtíðarinnar – friðun, vistvænni veiðar og réttlátara kvótakerfi Arnar Helgi Lárusson Skoðun
Er betra að fólk sé sett á sakamannabekk en að stjórnmálamenn vinni vinnuna sína? Ólafur Stephensen Skoðun