The Cost of Inconsistency Aldo Marchiano Kaligis og Guðbjörg Lára Másdóttir skrifa 18. október 2023 10:01 The unfolding tragedy in Gaza is undeniably heart-wrenching. Our hearts go out to the Palestinians who have lost their lives during Israel's recent invasion. While the world watches, we are compelled to reflect on the larger issue at play: the glaring double standards in how we address human rights violations. In this article, we delve into the ongoing conflict in Gaza and its implications, focusing on the disproportionate responses and selective condemnation that echo across the global stage. The recent conflict in Gaza traces its origins to 7 October 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel. Israel responded, and the cycle of violence has continued unabated. As of today, more than 1,900 Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis have tragically lost their lives. The devastating toll on human lives paints a grim picture of the ongoing conflict. In the face of this conflict, the WEIRD (White/Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Developed/Democratic) world has offered its perspectives. Criticisms have flowed, primarily directed at Hamas, citing the number of civilian casualties on the Israeli side. Strikingly, the same level of scrutiny has not been extended to Israel despite its counterattacks being perceived as highly disproportionate. Leaders from WEIRD countries have endorsed Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas's attacks. Iceland's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Þórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörð Gylfadóttir, and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, have expressed unwavering support for Israel's actions. However, the glaring omission in their statements is the failure to acknowledge concerns of genocide, crimes against humanity, or apartheid targeting Palestinians. Paradoxically, these statements seem at odds with previous policies and comments. For example, Iceland was the pioneer among Western and Northern European countries in recognizing Palestine as an independent state back in 2011. This recognition extended beyond politics to society, as seen when Iceland's sensational heavy metal Eurovision performance by Hatari involved raising Palestinian flags during the event hosted in Israel in 2019. On the other hand, in 2022, von der Leyen strongly criticized Russia's military aggression in Ukraine, characterizing the attack as "grossly violating international law and undermining European and global security and stability." The double standards applied to Israel's most recent killing spree are not just a matter of rhetoric; they have far-reaching implications for global human rights efforts. The principles of universality, indivisibility, equality, and non-discrimination that underpin human rights may be undermined when responses from WEIRD countries – often dubbed as the champions of human rights – diverge from these ideals. Indonesia provides a pertinent case study, taking inspiration from WEIRD countries' inconsistent responses to take a hypocritical turn when responding to allegations of human rights violations. For example, while vocally expressing concern for Gaza, Indonesia's own human rights issues, particularly in its westernmost region, Papua, have been met with deflection. On 10 October 2023, President Joko Widodo urged "the immediate end of war and violence to avoid further human casualties and damages of property because conflict escalation may give rise to further humanitarian impact" and added, "The root of the conflict, namely the occupation of the territory of Palestine by Israel, must immediately be resolved." However, the statement came against prolonged human rights violations and armed forces occupation by Indonesia in Papua. For decades, Indonesia has conducted military operations in Papua to quell the Papuans' self-independence claims, resulting in an estimated loss of life between 2,000 and 500,000individuals. Experts argue that these campaigns amount to slow genocide. This is substantiated by the demographic shift observed over the years: in the 1970s, Indigenous Papuans constituted 96 percent of the population, yet by 2010, that number had dwindled to just 48 percent. The Indonesian government has consistently denied allegations of human rights violations in Papua, deflecting international concern. In 2019, a government spokesperson expressed displeasureat Papua being included on the formal agenda of the Pacific Islands Forum's leaders' meeting in Tuvalu, warning that this could set a dangerous precedent for external interference in the domestic affairs of other nations. In conclusion, the double standards in addressing human rights issues are not just a matter of diplomatic discourse. These inconsistencies can have severe implications for global justice and the pursuit of accountability. The principles of universality, indivisibility, equality, and non-discrimination should be upheld universally, irrespective of political or strategic interests. As the world grapples with the ongoing conflict in Gaza, we are reminded that the fight for human rights must transcend geopolitical biases and confront the selective application of these principles for the betterment of all. Authors work for Aurora Foundation Sierra Leone and Amnesty International Indonesia. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Átök í Ísrael og Palestínu Mest lesið Lygin um flóttamenn á Íslandi Jón Frímann Jónsson Skoðun Viljum við stjórnarandstöðu sem þvælist ekki fyrir? Diljá Mist Einarsdóttir Skoðun „Glæpir“ Íslendinga Árni Davíðsson Skoðun Varst þú að kaupa gallaða fasteign? Sara Bryndís Þórsdóttir Skoðun Mismunun skýrir aukningu erlendra fanga Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun „Héraðsvötnin eru hjartsláttur fjarðarins“ Rakel Hinriksdóttir Skoðun Ef eitthvað væri að marka Bjarna Gunnar Smári Egilsson Skoðun Hlúum að persónumiðaðri nálgun í öldrunarþjónustu Margrét Guðnadóttir Skoðun Skólar hafa stigið skrefið með góðum árangri Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Á að hita upp allan Faxaflóann? Eiríkur Hjálmarsson skrifar Skoðun Á tímamótum: Sameinuðu þjóðirnar í 80 ár Vala Karen Viðarsdóttir,Védís Ólafsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Borgar sig að vanmeta menntun? Kolbrún Halldórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Samfylkingin hækkar gjöld á háskólanema Guðmundur Ingi Guðbrandsson skrifar Skoðun Aðgerðaáætlun í menntamálum ekki markviss Ingólfur Ásgeir Jóhannesson,Hermína Gunnþórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun „Héraðsvötnin eru hjartsláttur fjarðarins“ Rakel Hinriksdóttir skrifar Skoðun Lygin um flóttamenn á Íslandi Jón Frímann Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Mismunun skýrir aukningu erlendra fanga Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson skrifar Skoðun Farsæld barna í fyrirrúmi Bragi Bjarnason skrifar Skoðun Hlúum að persónumiðaðri nálgun í öldrunarþjónustu Margrét Guðnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Viljum við stjórnarandstöðu sem þvælist ekki fyrir? Diljá Mist Einarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Skólar hafa stigið skrefið með góðum árangri Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Varst þú að kaupa gallaða fasteign? Sara Bryndís Þórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir skrifar Skoðun „Glæpir“ Íslendinga Árni Davíðsson skrifar Skoðun Vörusvik Rafmenntar í nafni Kvikmyndaskóla Íslands og afleiðingar þeirra Böðvar Bjarki Pétursson,Friðrik Þór Friðriksson skrifar Skoðun Fleiri átök = verri útkoma í lestri? Birgir Hrafn Birgisson skrifar Skoðun Biðin sem (enn) veikir og tekur Guðlaugur Eyjólfsson skrifar Skoðun Stafrænt netöryggisbelti Hrannar Ásgrímsson skrifar Skoðun Hvert stefnir ráðherra? Aðalsteinn Árni Baldursson skrifar Skoðun Free tuition Colin Fisher skrifar Skoðun Þegar fólkið okkar langar að deyja Sigurborg Sveinsdóttir,Svava Arnardóttir skrifar Skoðun Why protest works Adam Daniel Fishwick skrifar Skoðun Í senn minning og ákvörðun um framtíð Elliði Vignisson skrifar Skoðun Reynslunni ríkari eftir fjárhagsleg áföll síðustu ára Njáll Trausti Friðbertsson skrifar Skoðun Ríkisstjórn lobbýistanna Jón Ferdínand Estherarson skrifar Skoðun 7 símtöl í röð - en ekkert fer í gegn Gró Einarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Áttaviti í öldrunarþjónustu Gunnlaugur Már Briem skrifar Skoðun Í skjóli hvíta bjargvættarins Yousef Ingi Tamimi skrifar Skoðun Að gjamma á stóra grábjörninn getur haft afleiðingar! Davíð Bergmann skrifar Sjá meira
The unfolding tragedy in Gaza is undeniably heart-wrenching. Our hearts go out to the Palestinians who have lost their lives during Israel's recent invasion. While the world watches, we are compelled to reflect on the larger issue at play: the glaring double standards in how we address human rights violations. In this article, we delve into the ongoing conflict in Gaza and its implications, focusing on the disproportionate responses and selective condemnation that echo across the global stage. The recent conflict in Gaza traces its origins to 7 October 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel. Israel responded, and the cycle of violence has continued unabated. As of today, more than 1,900 Palestinians and 1,200 Israelis have tragically lost their lives. The devastating toll on human lives paints a grim picture of the ongoing conflict. In the face of this conflict, the WEIRD (White/Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Developed/Democratic) world has offered its perspectives. Criticisms have flowed, primarily directed at Hamas, citing the number of civilian casualties on the Israeli side. Strikingly, the same level of scrutiny has not been extended to Israel despite its counterattacks being perceived as highly disproportionate. Leaders from WEIRD countries have endorsed Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas's attacks. Iceland's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Þórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörð Gylfadóttir, and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, have expressed unwavering support for Israel's actions. However, the glaring omission in their statements is the failure to acknowledge concerns of genocide, crimes against humanity, or apartheid targeting Palestinians. Paradoxically, these statements seem at odds with previous policies and comments. For example, Iceland was the pioneer among Western and Northern European countries in recognizing Palestine as an independent state back in 2011. This recognition extended beyond politics to society, as seen when Iceland's sensational heavy metal Eurovision performance by Hatari involved raising Palestinian flags during the event hosted in Israel in 2019. On the other hand, in 2022, von der Leyen strongly criticized Russia's military aggression in Ukraine, characterizing the attack as "grossly violating international law and undermining European and global security and stability." The double standards applied to Israel's most recent killing spree are not just a matter of rhetoric; they have far-reaching implications for global human rights efforts. The principles of universality, indivisibility, equality, and non-discrimination that underpin human rights may be undermined when responses from WEIRD countries – often dubbed as the champions of human rights – diverge from these ideals. Indonesia provides a pertinent case study, taking inspiration from WEIRD countries' inconsistent responses to take a hypocritical turn when responding to allegations of human rights violations. For example, while vocally expressing concern for Gaza, Indonesia's own human rights issues, particularly in its westernmost region, Papua, have been met with deflection. On 10 October 2023, President Joko Widodo urged "the immediate end of war and violence to avoid further human casualties and damages of property because conflict escalation may give rise to further humanitarian impact" and added, "The root of the conflict, namely the occupation of the territory of Palestine by Israel, must immediately be resolved." However, the statement came against prolonged human rights violations and armed forces occupation by Indonesia in Papua. For decades, Indonesia has conducted military operations in Papua to quell the Papuans' self-independence claims, resulting in an estimated loss of life between 2,000 and 500,000individuals. Experts argue that these campaigns amount to slow genocide. This is substantiated by the demographic shift observed over the years: in the 1970s, Indigenous Papuans constituted 96 percent of the population, yet by 2010, that number had dwindled to just 48 percent. The Indonesian government has consistently denied allegations of human rights violations in Papua, deflecting international concern. In 2019, a government spokesperson expressed displeasureat Papua being included on the formal agenda of the Pacific Islands Forum's leaders' meeting in Tuvalu, warning that this could set a dangerous precedent for external interference in the domestic affairs of other nations. In conclusion, the double standards in addressing human rights issues are not just a matter of diplomatic discourse. These inconsistencies can have severe implications for global justice and the pursuit of accountability. The principles of universality, indivisibility, equality, and non-discrimination should be upheld universally, irrespective of political or strategic interests. As the world grapples with the ongoing conflict in Gaza, we are reminded that the fight for human rights must transcend geopolitical biases and confront the selective application of these principles for the betterment of all. Authors work for Aurora Foundation Sierra Leone and Amnesty International Indonesia.
Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun
Skoðun Aðgerðaáætlun í menntamálum ekki markviss Ingólfur Ásgeir Jóhannesson,Hermína Gunnþórsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Vörusvik Rafmenntar í nafni Kvikmyndaskóla Íslands og afleiðingar þeirra Böðvar Bjarki Pétursson,Friðrik Þór Friðriksson skrifar
Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun